ITA | ENG

Atelier dell'Errore (Atelier of Mistake): Language at the Margin

Issue #1

The animals of the Atelier dell'Errore’s artists awaken memory and recall aspects of life lost in the past. They are both distant and futuristic. They are destinations we depart from and return to. They have already existed, yet they still need to become.

—Marco Belpoliti, Atlas of Prophetic Zoology (Corraini Edition)


Within the contemporary art panorama, the Atelier dell'Errore (AdE) is a radical workshop of creativity and experimentation. Founded in 2002 by artist Luca Santiago Mora, it began as a space dedicated to neurodivergent children and their artistic expression. Over time, it evolved into an autonomous entity that challenges dominant aesthetic and social paradigms. In this environment, a mistake is not seen as a failure to be corrected, but as a productive deviation—an open door to unforeseen possibilities and new expressive solutions.


The artworks produced within the AdE form a visionary bestiary populated by hybrid creatures and unclassifiable forms that resist rigid categorization. These images, born out of messiness and spontaneity, transform the concept of mistake into a creative resource, capable of questioning the rigidity of traditional classification. In this way, the Atelier not only values neurodivergence but also transforms it into the foundation for an accessible artistic language.


The Atelier brings to light the questionable aspects of human classification systems. Today, to classify often means to assign rankings and confine people into categories that reflect criteria of productivity and competition. Such logic penalizes those who fall outside these standards, relegating neurodivergent experiences to the margins. But what if the mistake were interpreted as a necessary divergence? The Atelier dell'Errore offers exactly this kind of inversion, creating a space where the creative process is not judged but nurtured, free from normative impositions.


From this perspective, their practice becomes an instrument of resistance against standardization. It counters much of today’s cultural institutions—museums and foundations, for example—which often limit themselves to preserving the past rather than cultivating dynamic spaces for exploring the present and future. Accessibility, therefore, cannot be reduced to eliminating architectural barriers; it must also guarantee authentic forms of interaction and co-creation, where each visitor can genuinely discover new languages in relation to the artworks. A museum, decentered from capitalist ambitions, can transform itself into a workshop of co-creation, where people are not passive consumers but active participants.


The works of the AdE are not the product of individual talent but the outcome of a collective process. They demonstrate that art is not only an object of observation but also an instrument of plural expression. In cultural spaces, especially museums, neurodivergence can be embraced as a resource—supporting and legitimizing diverse ways of perceiving and experiencing the world, opening a window onto new cognitive and creative dimensions.


The collective, recognized internationally with exhibitions at the Venice Biennale and the Maramotti Collection, continues its autonomous workshop practice. In February 2025, Kaufmann Repetto (New York) hosted the first solo exhibition of the AdE in the United States. The Atelier dell'Errore reminds us that there is no single way to express human potential—there are many. From this perspective, neurodivergent people are no longer positioned at the margins but emerge as co-creators of a fairer future.


Martina Isernia

(San Miniato, 1997) is currently a PhD candidate at the Academy of Fine Arts in Rome and the University of Tor Vergata. Her research focuses on the relationship between museum accessibility and neurodivergence, exploring practices such as the design of educational workshops, with playful approaches aimed at developing the potential of play. She works as an educator, curator, and arts mediator, committed to centering difference by embracing the full spectrum of human neurodiversity—moving beyond frameworks that label what is “typical” as right and what diverges as wrong or in need of correction, and instead recognising it as an ever-evolving possibility for action.

ARCHIVE

Show all issues